Next Article in Journal
Effects of Exogenous Bacterial Agents on Material Transformation and Microbial Community Composition during Composting of Tomato Stalks
Previous Article in Journal
Techno-Economic Analysis of Hybrid Renewable Energy-Based Electricity Supply to Gwadar, Pakistan
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Use of Tailings as a Substitute for Sand in Concrete Blocks Production: Gravimetric Mining Wastes as a Case Study

1
Escuela Superior Politécnica del Litoral, ESPOL, Facultad de Ingeniería en Ciencias de la Tierra, Campus Gustavo Galindo km 30.5 Vía Perimetral, Guayaquil 090904, Ecuador
2
Mexican Geological Survey (SGM), Felipe Angeles Blvd., Km. 93.50-4, Pachuca 42083, Mexico
3
Instituto de Investigación Geológico y Energético, De las Malvas E15-142 y de los Perales-Monteserrín, Quito 170503, Ecuador
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2022, 14(23), 16285; https://doi.org/10.3390/su142316285
Submission received: 20 October 2022 / Revised: 22 November 2022 / Accepted: 29 November 2022 / Published: 6 December 2022

Abstract

:
This study assesses the feasibility of reusing tailings from a gold mining area in southern Ecuador in concrete block (CB) manufacturing. For this purpose, physical, chemical, and mineralogical analyses were performed to characterize the tailings. Furthermore, the tailing samples were subjected to the European Standard EN 12457-2 leaching test to assess the potential risk of releasing toxic elements (PTE) into the environment. The CBs were made conventionally and replaced 50% and 70% of the sand with tailings. Lastly, mechanical resistance tests (MRTs) were performed to evaluate the indirect tensile strength, compressive strength, and absorption. The study results show that tailings are feasible as a substitute for sand in manufacturing CBs. Furthermore, the leaching tests complied with the set limit for non-hazardous mining wastes. Regarding the MRT, the CBs made with 50% of tailings were the ones that gave the most favorable results; however, the compressive strength and absorption did not comply with the regulations. In this regard, making CBs with less than 50% tailings is recommended to evaluate their mechanical properties. This study offers an alternative for recycling tailings and contributing to the circular economy.

1. Introduction

The mining industry produces economic and social benefits worldwide through the supply of raw materials [1]. However, mining activities also produce massive amounts of waste that negatively impact the environment if not suitably managed [2,3,4]. One of the main concerns regarding mining waste is the amount generated, even up to 65 billion tons per year [5]. These wastes are usually put into storage facilities (tailings dams and waste rock piles), many of which are built without adequate safety standards, mainly in developed countries [6,7].
Regarding the tailings, the intensive space–time deposition and the characteristics of wastes make them a potential risk structure for the environment, human health, and safety [3,8,9]. In addition, the lack of mining–environmental regulations and the inadequate management of mining wastes have caused several accidents with tailings dams around the world [10], as well as environmental contamination and risks to the ecosystem and the population [6,11,12,13]. For example, in Ecuador, the last mining tailing accident was in July 2020, caused by the failure of a retaining wall, discharging about 50 tons of contaminants into the Tenguel river in the Ponce Enriquez mining area [7]. Accordingly, numerous papers deal with tailings issues, from historical analysis of tailings dam failure risk [14] to developments and new insights for environmental sustainability and disaster control of tailings dams [15]. First, however, it is necessary to work on the sustainable management of tailings and to see them with a possibility of reuse [16]. Therefore, reasonable utilization of tailings may shift the waste material into valuable raw materials and harness and improve the surroundings. Tailings should be thoroughly recycled and reused because they constitute a secondary resource [16].
According to the sustainable development goals from the United Nations Development Programme for 2015 to 2030, mining can contribute with actions based on the circular economy and collaborate throughout the supply chain to minimize waste, and reuse and recycle it. In this regard, it is sought after that the waste of one becomes the raw material of the other [17,18]. However, it is relevant to mention that there is no generic way to address the mining tailings issues. Each approach will depend directly on the characteristics of the tailings. In some cases, the tailings may be reused as a potential critical mineral resource [19]. Sometimes, they will not represent toxicity potential to the environment [20] and can be employed as a substitute for raw construction materials, reconstruction of landforms, or rehabilitation of mining areas [21]. However, whatever use and reuse is given to the tailings will already be a sustainable option for environmental mitigation.
In the circular economy, the reuse and recycling of mining waste can considerably reduce the environmental impacts and the potential risk related to mining waste storage [5,22]. On the other hand, the demand for raw materials grows yearly, so mining waste production also increases. In this sense, the transition towards a sustainable mining industry, in agreement with environmental legal frameworks, is essential [1,23,24].
In recent years, diverse mining waste reuse and recycling strategies have been studied [2,25,26,27]. One favorable application for these uses is in the construction industry [28,29,30]. This industry demands the intensive exploitation of natural resources, so using mining wastes as a replacement for raw materials is a sustainable alternative to mitigate the environmental impacts [31,32].
Recent works have evaluated the use of abandoned base-metal tailings as fine aggregates for mortar preparation [29], the incorporation of sulphidic mining wastes from inactive Pb-Zn and Cu-Zn-Pb mines in ceramic roof tiles and blocks [33], the use of Mn-mining wastes as a filler material in Portland cement [34], cement production using kaolin mining wastes [35], the use of lead ore flotation waste in building ceramics [36], bricks production using mining wastes [8], and the production of wall and floor tiles using boron mining wastes [37], obtaining favorable results in most of the studies mentioned above.
Despite the progress in this research field, more than 150 mineral processing plants in Ecuador generate large amounts of mining waste. Consequently, its management and final disposal become an economic, social, and environmental problem. Therefore, this study aims to conduct experimental research to assess the viability of reusing tailings as a substitute for sand in manufacturing concrete blocks. This approach promotes an alternative sustainable approach to managing mining wastes with economic and environmental benefits. In addition, with tailings reuse the extraction of raw materials for the construction industry can be reduced, thus promoting the circular economy.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Area

The study area is part of the Campanillas mining concession in southern Ecuador, located in Zamora Chinchipe (Figure 1). Campanillas is a small-scale mining concession that processes between 20 and 30 tons/day using gravimetric processes, generating around 19 tons/day of tailings. These mining wastes are stored in a tailings dam with an approximate capacity of 12,250 m3. Campanilllas was selected as a case study because it presents common characteristics of small-scale gold mining activity in Ecuador and because of the mining company’s interest in implementing sustainable strategies for reusing mining waste.
The study area presents two geological units. The main unit is Piuntza, a group of Inferior Jurassic rocks, where sandstones, clays, and argillites have been reported. The unit is a sequence of volcano-sedimentary rocks composed of andesites with tuffs and volcanic breccias of varied texture, with sediments of volcanic origin with fine to medium grain sizes of greenish–gray color. There are also mineralizations in skarn-type rock with hydrothermal alterations [38]. In addition, outcrops can be found in the NW–SW direction, with pyrite and chalcopyrite veins and highly fractured rocks that host mainly Au, Cu, and Zn in vetiform mineralization [39]. The second unit is Zamora, which is considered a batholith type I. This unit comprises a series of lithologies, ranging from granites to granodiorites and coarse to medium-grained hornblende-biotitic, including potassium feldspar megacrysts, quartzmonzodiorites with pink perthite megacrysts, granular subvolcanic intrusives such as microdiorites, and hornblende porphyries [40].

2.2. Sample Collection and Preparation

According to the methodology proposed by Smith [41], six sites were sampled randomly at the tailing dam (Figure 1). First, a surface layer of 0.1 m was removed in each one, then 36.5 kg of tailings were collected at a depth between 0.1 and 0.5 m using a hand shovel. As a result, a composite sample of 219 kg was collected. This sample was transported in polyethylene bags and stored at room temperature. In the laboratory, the composite sample was air-dried and homogenized. Then, the sample was sieved through an 8 mm and 4 mm stainless steel sieve. Then, the sample was spread on the floor on a polyethylene film covering an approximate surface of 1.15 × 1.45 m and a deepness of 0.1 m. Following the division method by increments [42], a homogenized lot with 20 arrangements was obtained. Finally, by random sampling, ten samples of 1 kg each were collected in arrays 3, 7, 8, 10, 12, 14, 15, 16, 17, and 20. Each sample was reduced to 0.5 kg using a riffle splitter. The number of kg used for physicochemical and mineralogical analysis was 0.4, and 0.1 kg was used for leaching tests. Samples were labeled CA, standing for Campanillas, followed by a consecutive sampling number.

2.3. Analytical Procedures

2.3.1. Tailing Physicochemical and Mineralogical Properties

The grain size distribution was determined using eight grain-size classes according to the normalized protocol ASTM C 117 [43]. The Gay-Lussac BOECO® pycnometer analyzed the bulk and real density according to the Villaseñor-Ortiz [44] method. Mineralogy was determined by X-ray diffraction spectroscopy (XRD) [45]. XRD analyses were carried out using a Bruker AXS D8 Advance diffractometer equipped with a copper anticathode, scanning over a diffraction angle range of 4° to 75° with a step size of 0.01° per step. Minerals were identified based on the peaks and d-spaces using the software DIFFRAC.EVA for identification and DIFFRAC.TOPAS for quantification.
Potentially toxic elements (PTE), As, Cd, Co, Cr, Cu, Mo, Ni, Pb, Sb, Se, V, and Zn, were identified and quantified using the optical spectroscopy technique according to E2941-14 [46] and 6010D [47] standard methods. An optical emission spectrometer (ICP-OES) from Perkin Elmer®, model OPTIMA 8300, was used with previous total digestion with four acids (HNO3-HCl-HClO4-HF). The reference standard employed was ERA D110-540 Metals in Soil, PriorityPollutnT™. Major elements (Na2O, MgO, Al2O3, SiO2, P2O5, SO3, K2O, CaO, TiO2, Mn2O3, Fe2O3) were analyzed using the XRF fluorescence E1621-13 standard method [48,49], using Bruker S8 Tiger Series 2 spectrometer equipment. In addition, Hg content was quantified by cold-vapor atomic absorption spectrometry following the 30501A [50] and 7471B [51] standard methods. During the analytical procedures, all the obtained results were assessed with an internal quality control system of the IIGE labs, which has a management system implemented under the NTE INEN-ISO/IEC17025:2018 standard.

2.3.2. Leaching Tests

The tailing samples were leached by the European compliance laboratory leaching test (EN LLT) [52] (Table 1). An extraction test with deionized water was carried out to simulate scenarios in which the tailings are in contact with solutions with low buffering capacity, such as rainwater [53].
The eluates’ pH, specific conductivity (SC), and redox potential (Eh) were measured with a HATCH® portable multimeter. In addition, PTE was quantified by inductively coupled plasma mass spectroscopy (ICP-MS) from Agilent 7700x, according to 3120D [55] and 6020B [56] standard methods.

2.4. Indices of Contamination (IC)

The IC from Alberruche del Campo et al. [57] is a tool used to determine the contaminant potential from mining wastes and is calculated by the following equation:
IC = 1 / n i = 1 n X i / RL x
where X is the element concentration in mining waste leachate; RLX is the reference levels for each element measured in the leachate; and n is the number of elements measured whose concentrations are above the values adopted in RLX. The Ecuadorian legislation established the reference levels [58]. The assessment of the IC results was evaluated according to the classification proposed by Arranz-González et al. [59], as follows: very low (<3.2), low (3.2–6.4), medium (6.4–9.6), high (9.6–12.8), and very high (>12.8).

2.5. Concrete Blocks Production, Mechanical Resistance, and Leaching

The concrete blocks were made with three raw material proportions (Table 2). Firstly, with a conventional method with 100% sand. Secondly, by replacing 50% of the sand with tailing, and finally by replacing 70% of the sand with tailing. These values were selected based on the literature review [8,60,61,62]. A pallet of 14 blocks was produced for each proportion of raw materials. Each block measured 0.65 × 0.22 × 0.1 m.
To produce concrete blocks using the conventional method, 17 kg of sand was mixed with 1.8 kg of Portland cement and approximately 1.4 L of water, then mixed at 33.3 rpm for 8 min. Subsequently, the mixture was placed for 6 s inside the molds in the Vibro-pressing machine. Afterward, the curing process was carried out, moistening the blocks thrice a day for five days. Finally, the setting was completed, allowing the blocks to dry for 23 days at room temperature [63]. Then, the same procedure described in the conventional method was used to produce blocks with tailings as a substitute for sand (Figure 2a), with the proportions shown in Table 2.
Three were randomly selected for mechanical resistance tests from each pallet of blocks (made with each of the three raw material proportions). Assays were carried out in the Soil Laboratory of the Engineering Faculty in Earth Sciences of the Littoral Superior School of Ecuador. The tests applied to each concrete block were the compressive strength test (Figure 2b), using the standardized ASTM C140 method [64], and the absorption (Figure 2c) and indirect tensile strength tests (Figure 2d) using the Ecuadorian technical standard NTE-INEN 3040 methodology [65]. In addition, five concrete blocks were randomly selected from each pallet to determine which PTE could be solubilized. Then the blocks were crushed to a particle size of 2 mm, and the leaching EN LLT test was applied.

3. Results

3.1. Mining Wastes Characterization

As shown in Figure 3, the samples correspond to sands as the particle size is between 65 and 1000 µm [66]. These results suggest that tailings can replace sands in the elaboration of concrete blocks since they can be categorized as sands. Furthermore, the samples present an average d80 of 73.8 µm because these mining wastes come from a size reduction stage consisting of crushing–sorting–grinding. This particle size is expected because a ball mill is used in the grinding stage; therefore, the tailings’ particle size corresponds to fines (<100 µm). The tailings samples have nearly similar bulk densities (1.7 g/cm3 on average) and real densities (2.4 g/cm3 on average) (Table 3), which are close to quartz density [29], the principal mineralogical constituent of the samples and the main constituent of the sands used in the production of concrete blocks.
Regarding mineralogical characterization (Figure 4a), the samples have a typical tailing composition, with more than 85% silicates and less than 12% carbonates [67]. Although, it is worth noting the absence of sulfides in the XRD analysis since they usually represent between 1% and 40% of the tailing’s composition. The fact that no sulfides were found in the samples suggests that there will be no leaching of potentially toxic elements in the short term. On the other hand, the most significant mineralogical contents in tailing samples were quartz, at 36%. Other significant minerals in abundance were the plagioclase group (Albite and Anorthite) (22%) and andradite (19%). The group of K-feldspars (Orthoclase, Microcline, Sanidine) and calcite, both with neutralizing capacity, were found in a low proportion, with 7% and 6%, respectively. Calcite is a typical mineral in tailings and the most rapidly reacting carbonate mineral to contribute to neutralization processes [68,69]. Major elements determined by fluorescence XRF are presented in Figure 4b. The tailings were found to have a high content of SiO2, while CaO, Fe2O3, and Al2O3 were minor components. The content of SiO2 is related to the presence of quartz and other silicates. The CaO corresponds to the presence of calcite (CaCO3), which, when subjected to 1000 °C, originated CaO and CO2 4% of calcination losses (CL). Finally, the presence of Fe2O3 may be due to the high concentration of andradite ((SiO4)3Fe2Ca3). The amount of quartz detected in the tailing samples is relevant because it has a high mechanical resistance to impact, influencing the mechanical resistance of the concrete blocks made with tailings (Lam et al., 2020).
Physicochemical characterization and PTE content in mining wastes are present in Table 3. As, Cd, Co, Mo, Ni, Se, and Sb were below the detection limit (DL) in all samples, while Hg was below DL in nine out of ten samples. On the other hand, the concentration of Ba, Cr, Cu, Pb, and Zn were above the reference levels according to the Ecuadorian Environmental Legislation [58] in the ten samples. Such concentration indicates a potential environmental risk since the tailings are mostly made up of fine materials easily transported by the wind [70].

3.2. Assessment of Pollution Potential from Tailing Samples

IC was used as an indicator of the pollution level of the tailings due to the probability of erosion contamination scenarios [4]. The IC calculated stood between 1.4 and 1.8 (Table 3) which falls into the category of very low risk (IC < 3.2), which means that in the long term the tailings of this study present a very low probability of contamination due to erosion processes [59]. The percentage contribution of PTE in the contamination index result is similar in most samples (Figure 5). As previously mentioned, Ba, Cr, Cu, and Zn exceeded the Ecuadorian reference levels for soil quality in 100% of the analyzed samples, 90% in Pb, and Hg was only higher than the reference levels in sample CA-01. Nevertheless, based on the IC, the tailings are categorized as having very low pollution, suggesting no potential environmental risk.
The results of the release of PTE from the tailings are presented in Table 4. It is important to note that no element exceeds the reference values of the Royal Decree 646/2020, so they are considered inert waste and, therefore, are suitable for reuse as a sand substitute. In addition, the mine tailings’ pH is neutral, with values between 7.0 and 7.3, suggesting a low degree of solubilization of the elements contained in the tailings. These results agree with Argane et al. [29], who reported that tailings used as aggregates in the manufacturing of construction material in the Moulouya region (Morocco) have very low generating potential of contaminated effluents; therefore, their reuse is an efficient alternative for tailing management.

3.3. Mechanical Resistance Tests of Concrete Blocks

The mechanical resistance results for the concrete blocks produced conventionally and with 50% and 70% of tailing are presented in Figure 6. The indirect traction test showed that only two of the concrete blocks made with 50% of tailings (CA-50%-B1 and CA-50%-B2) gave resistance values greater than 2.9 MPa (Figure 6a), which are the compliance criteria set by the Ecuadorian technical standard NTE-INEN 3040. This standard sets concrete blocks’ materials, properties, requirements, and test methods [65].
Regarding compressive strength, according to the standard ASTM C140 [64], the minimum value requirement is 55 MPa. Nevertheless, all the blocks analyzed reported values lower than the compliance criteria. As shown in Figure 6b, the sample CA-50%-B1 was the closest to the compliance criteria, so further studies could evaluate how to improve the compressive strength in detail. Compressive strength is related to the water–cement ratio; reducing this proportion could decrease porosity and increase compressive strength [34]. In addition, high compressive strength is attributed to the high bonding interactions between particles due to the fineness of waste particles and their plasticity [71].
Concerning the absorption test (Figure 6c), no block met the maximum absorption value of 6% established in the standard NTE-INEN 3040. The concrete blocks produced conventionally and using 50% of tailing were in the same absorption range. In comparison, the blocks manufactured with the highest amount of waste (70%) showed the highest value for absorption. Based on these results, the use of 70% tailings in the production of blocks presents the least favorable results. On the other hand, more tests should be carried out with blocks with 50% tailings to obtain more conclusive results. In addition, making blocks with a lower proportion of tailings, for example, 40% and 30%, is recommended to evaluate their mechanical properties and have more conclusive results.

3.4. Environmental Considerations about the Concrete Blocks

Studying the environmental behavior of concrete blocks is essential to guarantee that they will be safe for users and the environment. Table 5 shows the leaching test results applied to the concrete blocks. As can be seen, the concentration of PTE in blocks produced using both 50% and 70% of tailing is significantly lower than the limit set for inert wastes established in the Royal Decree 646/2020. The As, Ba, Cd, Co, Cu, Mo, Ni, Pb, Sb, Se, V, Zn, SO4, F, and Cl content in all concrete blocks sample leachates was insignificant or below detection limits for the ICP-MS analysis. Cr showed similar concentrations for all blocks ranging from 1 to 4 mg/kg, which is higher than the Royal Decree 646/2020 limits (0.5 mg/kg). The Cr release in block samples may be related to their leachates’ higher pH (12 on average). However, few studies have investigated the Cr in mining wastes. In addition, unlike other PTE in which the total concentration is relevant, the toxicity depends on the available oxidation states in Cr. Therefore, a future study should look into the oxidation states of Cr present in the blocks since Cr (III) is considered benign and essential as a micronutrient. At the same time, Cr (VI) is highly toxic and carcinogenic [72]. On the other hand, as shown in Table 4 (tailings leaching) and Table 5 (blocks leaching), the pH ranged from neutral to basic and the Eh from positive to negative. These results suggest that in the tailings the conditions are oxidizing and neutral, while in the cement blocks there are reducing and basic conditions, which could mean that the PTE has less mobilization potential in the cement blocks than in the tailings.

4. Conclusions

This paper assessed the potential use of tailings as a substitute for sand in concrete block production. For this purpose, physical, chemical, mineralogical, and mechanical characterization were performed on tailings and concrete block samples. As a result, the Index of Contamination (IC) used as an indicator of the pollution level was into the category of very low risk (IC < 3.2) for all of the samples, which means that in the long term the tailings present a very low probability of pollution. Furthermore, the results show that the leachates from the tailings of the Campanillas mine have low contents of PTE and comply with the reference values of the Royal Decree 646/2020 for inert waste. Therefore, the tailings are suitable for use as a sand substitute.
Moreover, the leaching test results for concrete blocks (with 50% and 70% of tailing) concluded that the concrete blocks made with tailings do not produce toxic leachates. Therefore, they are not considered potentially dangerous for users and the environment. Regarding the mechanical resistance tests, the concrete blocks made with 50% of tailings were the ones that gave the most favorable results; however, the compressive strength and absorption did not comply with the regulations. Therefore, further research should be undertaken to improve the mechanical resistance of blocks manufactured with tailings as a substitute for sand. This study constitutes a proposal to reuse tailings simply, thus promoting the circular economy and sustainability in the mining industry. However, the characteristics of mining waste can vary significantly and, thus, vary its applicability in the construction industry. Therefore, the residues and products made from them must be duly examined and monitored so that their use is not dangerous for users.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, F.G.-M. and S.J.-O.; data curation, D.M. and L.L.; formal analysis, D.M., F.G.-M., M.A., L.C. and D.I.; investigation, D.M. and L.L.; methodology, D.M., F.G.-M., M.A., L.C., D.I. and S.J.-O.; supervision S.J.-O. and F.G.-M.; writing—original draft, D.M., F.G.-M. and S.J.-O.; writing—review and editing, M.A., L.C. and D.I.; project administration, S.J.-O. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

We thank Daniel Falquez from the Soil Laboratory of the Engineering Faculty in Earth Sciences of the Escuela Superior Politécnica del Litoral (ESPOL). In addition, we thank the Geological and Energy Research Institute (IIGE) of Ecuador for their support in this research.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Gedam, V.V.; Raut, R.D.; Lopes de Sousa Jabbour, A.B.; Agrawal, N. Moving the Circular Economy Forward in the Mining Industry: Challenges to Closed-Loop in an Emerging Economy. Resour. Policy 2021, 74, 102279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Capasso, I.; Lirer, S.; Flora, A.; Ferone, C.; Cioffi, R.; Caputo, D.; Liguori, B. Reuse of Mining Waste as Aggregates in Fly Ash-Based Geopolymers. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 220, 65–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Lam, E.J.; Zetola, V.; Ramírez, Y.; Montofré, Í.L.; Pereira, F. Making Paving Stones from Copper Mine Tailings as Aggregates. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 2448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Arranz-González, J.C.; Rodríguez-Gómez, V.; Fernández-Naranjo, F.J.; Vadillo-Fernández, L. Assessment of the Pollution Potential of a Special Case of Abandoned Sulfide Tailings Impoundment in Riotinto Mining District (SW Spain). Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 28, 14054–14067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Kalisz, S.; Kibort, K.; Mioduska, J.; Lieder, M.; Małachowska, A. Waste Management in the Mining Industry of Metals Ores, Coal, Oil and Natural Gas—A Review. J. Environ. Manag. 2022, 304, 114239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Escobar-Segovia, K.; Jiménez-Oyola, S.; Garcés-León, D.; Paz-Barzola, D.; Chavez, E.; Romero-Crespo, P.; Salgado, B. Heavy Metals in Rivers Affected By Mining Activities in Ecuador: Pollution and Human Health Implications. Sustain. Water Resour. Manag. XI Eff. Approaches River Basins Urban Catchments 2021, 1, 61–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ruiz, V. Ecuador Reports Tailings Dam Breach in Azuay Province. Available online: https://www.mining.com/ecuador-reports-tailings-dam-breach-in-azuay-province/ (accessed on 9 March 2021).
  8. Vilela, A.P.; Eugênio, T.M.C.; de Oliveira, F.F.; Mendes, J.F.; Ribeiro, A.G.C.; Brandão, L.E.V.D.S.; Mendes, R.F. Technological Properties of Soil-Cement Bricks Produced with Iron Ore Mining Waste. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020, 262, 120883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Calandra, P.; Quaranta, S.; Apolo Miranda Figueira, B.; Caputo, P.; Porto, M.; Oliviero Rossi, C. Mining Wastes to Improve Bitumen Performances: An Example of Circular Economy. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2022, 614, 277–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Rana, N.M.; Ghahramani, N.; Evans, S.G.; McDougall, S.; Small, A.; Take, W.A. Catastrophic Mass Flows Resulting from Tailings Impoundment Failures. Eng. Geol. 2021, 292, 106262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Salgado-Almeida, B.; Falquez-Torres, D.A.; Romero-Crespo, P.L.; Valverde-Armas, P.E.; Guzmán-Martínez, F.; Jiménez-Oyola, S. Risk Assessment of Mining Environmental Liabilities for Their Categorization and Prioritization in Gold-Mining Areas of Ecuador. Sustainability 2022, 14, 6089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Jiménez-Oyola, S.; García-Martínez, M.-J.; Ortega, M.; Chavez, E.; Romero, P.; Garcia-Garizabal, I.; Bolonio, D. Ecological and Probabilistic Human Health Risk Assessment of Heavy Metal(Loid)s in River Sediments Affected by Mining Activities in Ecuador. Environ. Geochem. Health 2021, 43, 4459–4474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Guzmán-Martínez, F.; Arranz-González, J.C.; Ortega, M.F.; García-Martínez, M.J.; Rodríguez-Gómez, V. A New Ranking Scale for Assessing Leaching Potential Pollution from Abandoned Mining Wastes Based on the Mexican Official Leaching Test. J. Environ. Manag. 2020, 273, 111139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Halabi, A.L.M.; Siacara, A.T.; Sakano, V.K.; Pileggi, R.G.; Futai, M.M. Tailings Dam Failures: A Historical Analysis of the Risk. J. Fail. Anal. Prev. 2022, 22, 464–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Dong, L.; Deng, S.; Wang, F. Some Developments and New Insights for Environmental Sustainability and Disaster Control of Tailings Dam. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 269, 122270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Dong, L.; Tong, X.; Li, X.; Zhou, J.; Wang, S.; Liu, B. Some Developments and New Insights of Environmental Problems and Deep Mining Strategy for Cleaner Production in Mines. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 210, 1562–1578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Vilaça, A.S.I.; Simão, L.; Montedo, O.R.K.; Novaes de Oliveira, A.P.; Raupp-Pereira, F. Waste Valorization of Iron Ore Tailings in Brazil: Assessment Metrics from a Circular Economy Perspective. Resour. Policy 2022, 75, 102477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. UNDP Sustainable Development Goals|United Nations Development Programme. Available online: https://www.undp.org/sustainable-development-goals (accessed on 3 February 2022).
  19. Seal, R.R.; Piatak, N.M. Environmental Attributes and Resource Potential of Mill Tailings from Diverse Mineral Deposit Types. In Proceedings of the 13th International Mine Water Association Congress—Mine Water & Circular Economy, Lappeenranta, Finland, 25–30 June 2017; Wolkersdorfer, C., Sartz, L., Sillanpää, M., Häkkinen, A., Eds.; LUT Scientific and Expertise Publications: Lappeenranta, Finland, 2017; Volume 1, pp. 603–609. [Google Scholar]
  20. Lottermoser, B.G. Mine Wastes: Characterization, Treatment, Environmental Impacts, 2nd ed.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2007; ISBN 978-3-540-48629-9. [Google Scholar]
  21. Arranz-González, J.C.; Guzmán-Martínez, F.; Tapia-Téllez, A.; Jiménez-Oyola, S.; García-Martínez, M.J. Polluting Potential from Mining Wastes: Proposal for Application a Global Contamination Index. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2022, 194, 792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Tayebi-Khorami, M.; Edraki, M.; Corder, G.; Golev, A. Re-Thinking Mining Waste through an Integrative Approach Led by Circular Economy Aspirations. Minerals 2019, 9, 286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Lemos, M.G.; Valente, T.; Marinho-Reis, A.P.; Fonsceca, R.; Dumont, J.M.; Ferreira, G.M.M.; Delbem, I.D. Geoenvironmental Study of Gold Mining Tailings in a Circular Economy Context: Santa Barbara, Minas Gerais, Brazil. Mine Water Environ. 2021, 40, 257–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. WEF Can Mining and Metals Be Sustainable?|World Economic Forum. Available online: https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2015/09/can-mining-and-metals-be-sustainable (accessed on 24 May 2022).
  25. Martins, N.P.; Srivastava, S.; Veiga, F.; Niu, H.; Perumal, P.; Snellings, R.; Illikainen, M.; Chambart, H.; Habert, G. Exploring the Potential for Utilization of Medium and Highly Sulfidic Mine Tailings in Construction Materials: A Review. Sustainability 2021, 13, 12150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Mehta, N.; Dino, G.A.; Passarella, I.; Ajmone-Marsan, F.; Rossetti, P.; de Luca, D.A. Assessment of the Possible Reuse of Extractive Waste Coming from Abandoned Mine Sites: Case Study in Gorno, Italy. Sustainability 2020, 12, 2471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Zhang, Y.; Sun, H.; Gu, X.; Zhang, W.; Liu, B. Experimental Study on the Use of Iron Tailings-Based Multicomponent Solid Waste as SCMs. Sustainability 2022, 14, 5124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Amaral, I.B.C.; Cavalcante, L.C.D.; Fabris, J.D.; Prat, B.V.; Reis, A.B. Use of Mining Tailings or Their Sedimentation and Flotation Fractions in a Mixture with Soil to Produce Structural Ceramics. Sustainability 2021, 13, 911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Argane, R.; El Adnani, M.; Benzaazoua, M.; Bouzahzah, H.; Khalil, A.; Hakkou, R.; Taha, Y. Geochemical Behavior and Environmental Risks Related to the Use of Abandoned Base-Metal Tailings as Construction Material in the Upper-Moulouya District, Morocco. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2016, 23, 598–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Garcia-Troncoso, N.; Baykara, H.; Cornejo, M.H.; Riofrio, A.; Tinoco-Hidalgo, M.; Flores-Rada, J. Comparative Mechanical Properties of Conventional Concrete Mixture and Concrete Incorporating Mining Tailings Sands. Case Stud. Constr. Mater. 2022, 16, e01031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Paiva, H.; Yliniemi, J.; Illikainen, M.; Rocha, F.; Ferreira, V.M. Mine Tailings Geopolymers as Awaste Management Solution for a More Sustainable Habitat. Sustainability 2019, 11, 995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Ixchel, R.H.M.; de la Luz, P.R.M. Characterization of Mine Tailings in Their Natural State and Stabilized with Cement, Focused on Construction. Ing. Investig. Tecnol. 2021, 22, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Veiga Simão, F.; Chambart, H.; Vandemeulebroeke, L.; Cappuyns, V. Incorporation of Sulphidic Mining Waste Material in Ceramic Roof Tiles and Blocks. J. Geochemical Explor. 2021, 225, 106741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Gomes-Pimentel, M.; Rubens Cardoso da Silva, M.; de Cássia, S.; Viveiros, D.; Picanço, M.S. Manganese Mining Waste as a Novel Supplementary Material in Portland Cement. Mater. Lett. 2022, 309, 131459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Cardoso da Silva, M.R.; Salvi Malacarne, C.S.; Longhi, M.A.; Kirchheim, A.P. Valorization of Kaolin Mining Waste from the Amazon Region (Brazil) for the Low-Carbon Cement Production. Case Stud. Constr. Mater. 2021, 15, e00756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Mymrin, V.; Correia, R.; Alekseev, K.; Klitzke, W.; Avanci, M.; Rolim, P.; Argenta, M.; Carmo, J. Sustainable Materials from Hazardous Lead Ore Flotation Waste in Composites with Spent Foundry Sand and Clay. Int. J. Sci. Technoledge 2020, 109, 1333–1344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Cicek, B.; Karadagli, E.; Duman, F. Valorisation of Boron Mining Wastes in the Production of Wall and Floor Tiles. Constr. Build. Mater. 2018, 179, 232–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Wilkinson, M. Reviews Boudreau, B.P. In Diagenetic Models and Their Implementation. Modelling Transport and Reactions in Aquatic Sediments; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1997; pp. 877–883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Agencia de Regulación y Control de Energía y Recursos Naturales No Renovables, Ecuador (ARCERNNR). Geoportal de Catastro MineroLímites Territoriales Internos, CONALI 2020. Available online: arcgis.com (accessed on 20 March 2022).
  40. Barba, J. Estudio de Impacto Ambiental Expost y Plan de Manejo Ambiental Para La Fase de Exploración y Explotación Simultánea Bajo El Régimen de Pequeña Minería de La Concesión Minera Campanillas. Report. Ecuador. 2017. Available online: https://www.enamiep.gob.ec/wp-content/uploads/downloads/2017/08/ESIA-CAMPANILLAS-WEB.pdf (accessed on 20 March 2022).
  41. Smith, K.S.; Ramsey, C.A.; Hageman, P.L. Sampling Strategy for the Rapid Screening of Mine-Waste Dumps on Abandoned Mine Lands. Open-File Rep. 2000, 1453–1461. [Google Scholar]
  42. Aracena, I.; Triviño, T. Manual de Uso Público. Técnicas de Perforación, Muestreo y Caracterización Para La Recuperación de Elementos de Valor Desde Relaves. 2019. Available online: https://relavesconvalor.cl/material-descargable/ (accessed on 24 May 2022).
  43. ASTM. Standard Test Method for Materials Finer Than 75-μm (No. 200) Sieve in Mineral Aggregates by Washing 1; ASTM: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2013; Volume 4. [Google Scholar]
  44. Villaseñor-Ortiz, D. Fundamentos y Procedimientos Para Análisis Físicos y Morfológicos Del Suelo; Universidad Técnica de Machala: Machala, Ecuador, 2016; ISBN 9789942240828. [Google Scholar]
  45. Moore, D.M. X-ray Diffraction and the Identification and Analysis of Clay Minerals, 2nd ed.; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK; New York, NY, USA, 1997; ISBN 978-0-19-508713-0. [Google Scholar]
  46. ASTM E2941-14; Standard Practices for Extraction of Elements from Ores and Related Metallurgical Materials by Acid Digestion. ASTM: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2014.
  47. U.S. EPA Method 6010D; Inductively Coupled Plasma—Optical Emission Spectrometry. U.S. EPA: Washington, DC, USA, 2018.
  48. ASTM E1621-13; Standard Guide for Elemental Analysis by Wavelength Dispersive X-ray Fluorescence Spectrometry. ASTM: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2021.
  49. Jenkins, R. X-ray Fluorescence Spectrometry; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2012; ISBN 0471299421. [Google Scholar]
  50. Method 3051A (SW-846); Microwave Assisted Acid Digestion of Sediments, Sludges, and Oils. U.S. EPA: Washington, DC, USA, 2007.
  51. U.S. EPA Method 7471B Mercury in Solid or Semisolid Waste (Manual Cold-Vapor Technique). 2007. Available online: https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2015-12/documents/7471b.pdf (accessed on 24 May 2022).
  52. CEN. Characterization of Waste-Leaching-Compliance Test for Leaching of Granular Waste Materials and Sludges—Part 2: One Stage Batch Test at a Liquid to Solid Ratio of 10 L/Kg for Materials with Particle Size below 4 Mm (without or with Size Reduction); European Committee for Standardization: Brussels, Belgium, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  53. Al-Abed, S.R.; Hageman, P.L.; Jegadeesan, G.; Madhavan, N.; Allen, D. Comparative Evaluation of Short-Term Leach Tests for Heavy Metal Release from Mineral Processing Waste. Sci. Total Environ. 2006, 364, 14–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Guzmán-Martínez, F.; Arranz-González, J.C.; García-Martínez, M.; Ortega, M.F.; Rodríguez-Gómez, V.; Jiménez-Oyola, S. Comparative Assessment of Leaching Tests According to Lixiviation and Geochemical Behavior of Potentially Toxic Elements from Abandoned Mining Wastes. Mine Water Environ. 2022, 41, 265–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. SMWW 3120 Metals by Plasma Emission Spectroscopy. In Standard Methods for the Examination Water and Wastewater; American Public Health Association: Washington DC, USA, 2020.
  56. U.S. EPA Method 6020B; Inductively Coupled Plasma—Mass Spectrometry. U.S. EPA: Washington, DC, USA, 2014.
  57. del Campo, A.; Arranz-González, J.; Rodríguez-Gómez, V.; Vadillo, L.; Rodríguez, V.; Fernández, F. Manual Para La Evaluación de Riesgos de Instalaciones de Residuos de Industrias Extractivas Cerradas o Abandonadas, 1st ed.; Ministerio de Agricultura, Alimentación y Medio Ambiente España: Madrid, Spain; Instituto Geológico y Minero de España: Madrid, Spain, 2014; ISBN 9788478409341. [Google Scholar]
  58. TULSMA. Texto Unificado de Legislación Secundaria Medio Ambiental; Ministerio de Ambiente de Ecuador: Quito, Ecuador, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  59. Arranz-González, J.; Rodríguez-Gómez, V.; Rodríguez-Pacheco, R.; Fernández-Naranjo, F.J.; Vadillo-Fernández, L.; Alberruche del Campo, E. Guía Para La Rehabilitación de Instalaciones Abandonadas de Residuos Mineros. Ministerio para la Transición Ecológica España: Madrid, Spain; Instituto Geológico y Minero de España: Madrid, Spain, 2019; Volume 620. [Google Scholar]
  60. Roy, S.; Adhikari, G.R.; Gupta, R.N. Use of Gold Mill Tailings in Making Bricks: A Feasibility Study. Waste Manag. Res. 2007, 25, 475–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Thejas, H.K.; Hossiney, N. Compressed Unfired Blocks Made with Iron Ore Tailings and Slag. Cogent Eng. 2022, 9, 2032975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Thejas, H.K.; Hossiney, N. Alkali-Activated Bricks Made with Mining Waste Iron Ore Tailings. Case Stud. Constr. Mater. 2022, 16, e00973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. NTE INEN 1855-2; Hormigones. Hormigón Preparado En Obra. Requisitos. NTE INEN: Quito, Ecuador, 2015.
  64. ASTM C140/C140M-22a; Standard Test Methods for Sampling and Testing Concrete Masonry Units and Related Units. ASTM: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2022; pp. 1–24.
  65. NTE INEN 3040; Norma Técnica Ecuatoriana Adoquines de Hormigón. Requisitos y Métodos de Ensayo. NTE INEN: Quito, Ecuador, 2016.
  66. Folk, R.L. The Distinction between Grain Size and Mineral Composition in Sedimentary-Rock Nomenclature. J. Geol. 1954, 62, 344–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Blowes, D.W.; Ptacek, C.J.; Jurjovec, J. Mill Tailings: Hidrogeology and Geochemistry. In Environmental Aspects of Mine Wastes; Jambor, J.L., Blowes, D.W., Ritchie, A., Eds.; Mineralogical Association of Canada: Vancouver, BC, Canada, 2003; pp. 95–116. [Google Scholar]
  68. Jamieson, H.E.; Walker, S.R.; Parsons, M.B. Mineralogical Characterization of Mine Waste. Appl. Geochem. 2015, 57, 85–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Jamieson, H.E. Geochemistry and Mineralogy of Solid Mine Waste: Essential Knowledge for Predicting Environmental Impact. Elements 2011, 7, 381–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Mokhtari, A.R.; Feiznia, S.; Jafari, M.; Tavili, A.; Ghaneei-Bafghi, M.J.; Rahmany, F.; Kerry, R. Investigating the Role of Wind in the Dispersion of Heavy Metals Around Mines in Arid Regions (a Case Study from Kushk Pb–Zn Mine, Bafgh, Iran). Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2018, 101, 124–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Taha, Y.; Benzaazoua, M.; Edahbi, M.; Mansori, M.; Hakkou, R. Leaching and Geochemical Behavior of Fired Bricks Containing Coal Wastes. J. Environ. Manag. 2018, 209, 227–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Das, P.K.; Das, B.P.; Dash, P. Chromite Mining Pollution, Environmental Impact, Toxicity and Phytoremediation: A Review. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2021, 19, 1369–1381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Location of the study area, Zamora Chinchipe province, and satellite image where the tailing dam is highlighted.
Figure 1. Location of the study area, Zamora Chinchipe province, and satellite image where the tailing dam is highlighted.
Sustainability 14 16285 g001
Figure 2. (a) Concrete blocks produced with tailings, (b) compressive strength test, (c) indirect tensile strength test, and (d) absorption test.
Figure 2. (a) Concrete blocks produced with tailings, (b) compressive strength test, (c) indirect tensile strength test, and (d) absorption test.
Sustainability 14 16285 g002
Figure 3. Granulometric curves of samples from Campanillas tailings.
Figure 3. Granulometric curves of samples from Campanillas tailings.
Sustainability 14 16285 g003
Figure 4. (a) Mineralogical characterization determined by X-ray diffraction, and (b) chemical composition of tailing by XRF fluorescence.
Figure 4. (a) Mineralogical characterization determined by X-ray diffraction, and (b) chemical composition of tailing by XRF fluorescence.
Sustainability 14 16285 g004
Figure 5. Contribution of PTE contained in the sample to the index of contamination.
Figure 5. Contribution of PTE contained in the sample to the index of contamination.
Sustainability 14 16285 g005
Figure 6. Comparative assessment of (a) the indirect traction, (b) compression, and (c) absorption tests performed on the concrete blocks concerning the compliance criteria. The concrete blocks made with 50% tailings met the resistance values established by the Ecuadorian technical standard. On the contrary, the compression and absorption tests did not comply with the limits established in the regulations.
Figure 6. Comparative assessment of (a) the indirect traction, (b) compression, and (c) absorption tests performed on the concrete blocks concerning the compliance criteria. The concrete blocks made with 50% tailings met the resistance values established by the Ecuadorian technical standard. On the contrary, the compression and absorption tests did not comply with the limits established in the regulations.
Sustainability 14 16285 g006
Table 1. Parameters of the leaching tests.
Table 1. Parameters of the leaching tests.
CharacteristicEN-LLT
Test typeBatch
Liquid to solid ratio10:1
Extracting fluidDeionized water
pH of extracting fluid5.0 < pH < 7.5
Particle size used<2 mm
Sample amount100 g
Duration of agitation24 h
Agitation methodEnd-over-end rotatory (5–10 rpm)
FiltrationVacuum filtration device
Filter typeNitro-cellulose
Filter pore size0.45 micrometer
Source: Guzmán-Martínez et al. [54].
Table 2. Proportions of raw materials used for concrete blocks production.
Table 2. Proportions of raw materials used for concrete blocks production.
MethodSand (kg)Tailing (kg)Crushed Stone (kg)Portland Cement (kg)Water (L)Blocks ProducedSample Code *
Conventional method17001.81.414CA-Bn
By replacing 50% of the sand with tailing11.411.411.43.62.814CA-50%-Bn
By replacing 70% of the sand with tailing7.818.213.04.02.414CA-70%-Bn
* n is the consecutive number of the sample.
Table 3. Physicochemical characterization and PTE content in tailings.
Table 3. Physicochemical characterization and PTE content in tailings.
SampleBulk Density
(g/cm3)
Real Density
(g/cm3)
PTE Content (mg/kg)IC a
AsCdCoCrCuHgMoNiPbSeSbVZn
CA-011.72.3<DL<DL<DL76340.2<DL<DL26<DL<DL731591.8
CA-021.62.4<DL<DL<DL7833<DL<DL<DL35<DL<DL701611.5
CA-031.72.5<DL<DL<DL7134<DL<DL<DL34<DL<DL671641.4
CA-041.72.3<DL<DL<DL7732<DL<DL<DL43<DL<DL711611.5
CA-051.72.5<DL<DL<DL7535<DL<DL<DL35<DL<DL691711.5
CA-061.62.5<DL<DL<DL8035<DL<DL<DL29<DL<DL721651.4
CA-071.72.5<DL<DL<DL8233<DL<DL<DL29<DL<DL701831.5
CA-081.72.7<DL<DL<DL8733<DL<DL<DL<DL<DL<DL701601.4
CA-091.72.2<DL<DL<DL7235<DL<DL<DL35<DL<DL721611.4
CA-101.72.3<DL<DL<DL7632<DL<DL<DL31<DL<DL701561.4
Ecuadorian reference levels b120.51054250.1519191*7660
a Contamination index. b Reference levels according to Unified Text on Secondary Environmental Legislation [58]. <DL below detection limit. * PTE not listed in the reference level.
Table 4. Release of PTE obtained (mg/kg) from the EN-LLT leaching test method.
Table 4. Release of PTE obtained (mg/kg) from the EN-LLT leaching test method.
SamplepHEh (µS/cm)SC (mV) PTE Release (mg/kg)
AsBaCdCoCrCuMoNiPbSbSeVZnSO4FCl
CA-017.0181104<DL<DL<DL<DL<DL0.1<DL<DL<DL<DL<DL<DL0.21612412
CA-027.216298<DL<DL<DL<DL<DL0.1<DL<DL<DL<DL<DL<DL<DL1451233
CA-037.216397<DL<DL<DL<DL<DL0.1<DL<DL<DL<DL<DL<DL<DL135<DL122
CA-047.315495<DL<DL<DL<DL<DL0.1<DL<DL<DL<DL<DL<DL0.41471105
CA-057.1150112<DL<DL<DL<DL<DL0.1<DL<DL<DL<DL<DL<DL<DL159<DL17
CA-067.2178125<DL<DL<DL<DL<DL0.1<DL<DL<DL<DL<DL<DL0.3142<DL202
CA-077.3169117<DL<DL<DL<DL<DL0.1<DL<DL<DL<DL<DL<DL0.2157<DL121
CA-087.2161120<DL<DL<DL<DL<DL0.1<DL<DL<DL<DL<DL<DL<DL155<DL200
CA-097.2170118<DL<DL<DL<DL<DL0.1<DL<DL<DL<DL<DL<DL0.2166<DL9
CA-107.1148121<DL<DL<DL<DL<DL0.1<DL<DL<DL<DL<DL<DL0.3168<DL25
LLV a 0.5200.04*0.520.50.40.50.060.1*4100010800
a LLV: leaching limit values for inert waste admissible in landfills for inert waste by Royal Decree 646/2020. <DL below detection limit. * PTE not listed in the limit values for leaching.
Table 5. EN-LLT leaching test applied to the concrete blocks.
Table 5. EN-LLT leaching test applied to the concrete blocks.
SamplepHEh (S/cm)SC (mV)PTE Release (mg/kg)
AsBaCdCoCrCuMoNiPbSbSeVZnSO4FCl
CA-50%-B112.1−421424<DL0.3<DL<DL1<DL<DL<DL<DL<DL<DL0.02<DL30112
CA-50%-B212.1−481467<DL0.4<DL<DL2<DL0.1<DL<DL<DL<DL0.02<DL50111
CA-50%-B312.0−361200<DL0.3<DL<DL2<DL0.1<DL<DL<DL<DL0.03<DL50112
CA-50%-B412.1−361454<DL0.3<DL<DL3<DL0.1<DL<DL<DL<DL0.03<DL60111
CA-50%-B511.6−9561<DL0.2<DL<DL1<DL<DL<DL<DL<DL<DL0.07<DL6013
CA-70%-B112.1−281240<DL0.01<DL<DL2<DL0.1<DL<DL<DL<DL0.09<DL8011.1
CA-70%-B212.3−302170<DL0.3<DL<DL2<DL0.1<DL<DL<DL<DL0.03<DL60114
CA-70%-B311.7−17694<DL<DL<DL<DL4<DL0.1<DL<DL<DL<DL0.03<DL380110
CA-70%-B412.0−171104<DL0.07<DL<DL2<DL0.1<DL<DL<DL<DL0.09<DL100116
CA-70%-B511.4−1386<DL0.05<DL<DL1<DL<DL<DL<DL<DL<DL0.091401<DL
LLV a 0.5200.04*0.520.50.40.50.060.1*4100010800
a LLV: leaching limit values for inert waste admissible in landfills by Royal Decree 646/2020. <DL below detection limit. * PTE not listed in the reference level.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Méndez, D.; Guzmán-Martínez, F.; Acosta, M.; Collahuazo, L.; Ibarra, D.; Lalangui, L.; Jiménez-Oyola, S. Use of Tailings as a Substitute for Sand in Concrete Blocks Production: Gravimetric Mining Wastes as a Case Study. Sustainability 2022, 14, 16285. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142316285

AMA Style

Méndez D, Guzmán-Martínez F, Acosta M, Collahuazo L, Ibarra D, Lalangui L, Jiménez-Oyola S. Use of Tailings as a Substitute for Sand in Concrete Blocks Production: Gravimetric Mining Wastes as a Case Study. Sustainability. 2022; 14(23):16285. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142316285

Chicago/Turabian Style

Méndez, Diana, Fredy Guzmán-Martínez, Mauricio Acosta, Luis Collahuazo, Danilo Ibarra, Luis Lalangui, and Samantha Jiménez-Oyola. 2022. "Use of Tailings as a Substitute for Sand in Concrete Blocks Production: Gravimetric Mining Wastes as a Case Study" Sustainability 14, no. 23: 16285. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142316285

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop